Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 11th April 2025, holding that sustaining it would result in double taxation due to the mismatch between the input tax credit claimed and the inward supply statement in GSTR-2B. The Court found the order untenable in law and allowed the petition. The matter is remanded to the Additional State Tax Officer, Ganjam-I Circle, Ganjam, who is directed to issue intimation to the petitioner within one week of receiving the Court's order.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 11th April 2025, holding that sustaining it would result in double taxation due to the mismatch between the input tax credit claimed and the inward supply statement in GSTR-2B. The Court found the order untenable in law and allowed the petition. The matter is remanded to the Additional State Tax Officer, Ganjam-I Circle, Ganjam, who is directed to issue intimation to the petitioner within one week of receiving the Court's order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
