Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 11th April 2025, holding that sustaining it would result in double taxation due to the mismatch between the input tax credit claimed and the inward supply statement in GSTR-2B. The Court found the order untenable in law and allowed the petition. The matter is remanded to the Additional State Tax Officer, Ganjam-I Circle, Ganjam, who is directed to issue intimation to the petitioner within one week of receiving the Court's order.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 11th April 2025, holding that sustaining it would result in double taxation due to the mismatch between the input tax credit claimed and the inward supply statement in GSTR-2B. The Court found the order untenable in law and allowed the petition. The matter is remanded to the Additional State Tax Officer, Ganjam-I Circle, Ganjam, who is directed to issue intimation to the petitioner within one week of receiving the Court's order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
