Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 11th April 2025, holding that sustaining it would result in double taxation due to the mismatch between the input tax credit claimed and the inward supply statement in GSTR-2B. The Court found the order untenable in law and allowed the petition. The matter is remanded to the Additional State Tax Officer, Ganjam-I Circle, Ganjam, who is directed to issue intimation to the petitioner within one week of receiving the Court's order.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 11th April 2025, holding that sustaining it would result in double taxation due to the mismatch between the input tax credit claimed and the inward supply statement in GSTR-2B. The Court found the order untenable in law and allowed the petition. The matter is remanded to the Additional State Tax Officer, Ganjam-I Circle, Ganjam, who is directed to issue intimation to the petitioner within one week of receiving the Court's order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
