Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The HC held that cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, for non-filing of returns for six continuous months is valid and governed by Rule 22 of the CGST Rules, 2017. However, pursuant to the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22, if the petitioner is willing to furnish all pending returns and pay the due tax along with interest and late fees, the empowered officer may drop the cancellation proceedings and restore registration by issuing Form GST REG-20. Considering the serious civil consequences of cancellation, the HC directed the petitioner to approach the concerned authority within two months to comply with these conditions for restoration of GST registration. The writ petition was disposed accordingly.
The HC held that cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, for non-filing of returns for six continuous months is valid and governed by Rule 22 of the CGST Rules, 2017. However, pursuant to the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22, if the petitioner is willing to furnish all pending returns and pay the due tax along with interest and late fees, the empowered officer may drop the cancellation proceedings and restore registration by issuing Form GST REG-20. Considering the serious civil consequences of cancellation, the HC directed the petitioner to approach the concerned authority within two months to comply with these conditions for restoration of GST registration. The writ petition was disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
