Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 23.12.2024, which retrospectively cancelled the GST registration of the petitioner's vendors for alleged ineligible ITC availment under Section 16(2) of the GST Act. The order was held untenable due to non-consideration of the petitioner's replies and supporting documents, constituting a breach of natural justice. The matter was remanded to respondent No. 2 for a fresh de novo adjudication, mandating consideration of the petitioner's submissions dated 8.8.2024 and affording an opportunity for hearing if requested. The fresh order is to be passed within 12 weeks from receipt of the judgment. The petition was allowed solely on grounds of procedural infirmity without adjudicating the substantive GST issues.
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 23.12.2024, which retrospectively cancelled the GST registration of the petitioner's vendors for alleged ineligible ITC availment under Section 16(2) of the GST Act. The order was held untenable due to non-consideration of the petitioner's replies and supporting documents, constituting a breach of natural justice. The matter was remanded to respondent No. 2 for a fresh de novo adjudication, mandating consideration of the petitioner's submissions dated 8.8.2024 and affording an opportunity for hearing if requested. The fresh order is to be passed within 12 weeks from receipt of the judgment. The petition was allowed solely on grounds of procedural infirmity without adjudicating the substantive GST issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
