Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 23.12.2024, which retrospectively cancelled the GST registration of the petitioner's vendors for alleged ineligible ITC availment under Section 16(2) of the GST Act. The order was held untenable due to non-consideration of the petitioner's replies and supporting documents, constituting a breach of natural justice. The matter was remanded to respondent No. 2 for a fresh de novo adjudication, mandating consideration of the petitioner's submissions dated 8.8.2024 and affording an opportunity for hearing if requested. The fresh order is to be passed within 12 weeks from receipt of the judgment. The petition was allowed solely on grounds of procedural infirmity without adjudicating the substantive GST issues.
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 23.12.2024, which retrospectively cancelled the GST registration of the petitioner's vendors for alleged ineligible ITC availment under Section 16(2) of the GST Act. The order was held untenable due to non-consideration of the petitioner's replies and supporting documents, constituting a breach of natural justice. The matter was remanded to respondent No. 2 for a fresh de novo adjudication, mandating consideration of the petitioner's submissions dated 8.8.2024 and affording an opportunity for hearing if requested. The fresh order is to be passed within 12 weeks from receipt of the judgment. The petition was allowed solely on grounds of procedural infirmity without adjudicating the substantive GST issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
