Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the application for rectification of an erroneous HSN code in the petitioner's GSTR-9 return, noting discrepancies between the petitioner's statutory returns and ITC data from the seller's GSTR-1 and GSTR-2A. Although the rejection under Section 161 of the TNGST/CGST Act, 2017, was legally sound, the court acknowledged the petitioner's mistake as genuine. The petitioner failed to submit supporting documents before the assessment order. Given the petitioner's status as an authorized dealer engaged in cement trading, the HC set aside the impugned orders and remitted the matter to the respondents for fresh adjudication on merits, thereby disposing of the petition by way of remand.
The HC dismissed the application for rectification of an erroneous HSN code in the petitioner's GSTR-9 return, noting discrepancies between the petitioner's statutory returns and ITC data from the seller's GSTR-1 and GSTR-2A. Although the rejection under Section 161 of the TNGST/CGST Act, 2017, was legally sound, the court acknowledged the petitioner's mistake as genuine. The petitioner failed to submit supporting documents before the assessment order. Given the petitioner's status as an authorized dealer engaged in cement trading, the HC set aside the impugned orders and remitted the matter to the respondents for fresh adjudication on merits, thereby disposing of the petition by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
