Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the application for rectification of an erroneous HSN code in the petitioner's GSTR-9 return, noting discrepancies between the petitioner's statutory returns and ITC data from the seller's GSTR-1 and GSTR-2A. Although the rejection under Section 161 of the TNGST/CGST Act, 2017, was legally sound, the court acknowledged the petitioner's mistake as genuine. The petitioner failed to submit supporting documents before the assessment order. Given the petitioner's status as an authorized dealer engaged in cement trading, the HC set aside the impugned orders and remitted the matter to the respondents for fresh adjudication on merits, thereby disposing of the petition by way of remand.
The HC dismissed the application for rectification of an erroneous HSN code in the petitioner's GSTR-9 return, noting discrepancies between the petitioner's statutory returns and ITC data from the seller's GSTR-1 and GSTR-2A. Although the rejection under Section 161 of the TNGST/CGST Act, 2017, was legally sound, the court acknowledged the petitioner's mistake as genuine. The petitioner failed to submit supporting documents before the assessment order. Given the petitioner's status as an authorized dealer engaged in cement trading, the HC set aside the impugned orders and remitted the matter to the respondents for fresh adjudication on merits, thereby disposing of the petition by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
