Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned order determining the petitioner's liability to pay tax and interest under the TN GST Act 2017/CGST Act 2017, holding that the order was passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, thereby violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, no deposit condition was imposed. However, as the petitioner voluntarily deposited 25% of the disputed tax, which the respondent did not oppose, the matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh adjudication after providing an opportunity of hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC set aside the impugned order determining the petitioner's liability to pay tax and interest under the TN GST Act 2017/CGST Act 2017, holding that the order was passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, thereby violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, no deposit condition was imposed. However, as the petitioner voluntarily deposited 25% of the disputed tax, which the respondent did not oppose, the matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh adjudication after providing an opportunity of hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
