Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3481 to 3500 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned order determining the petitioner's liability to pay tax and interest under the TN GST Act 2017/CGST Act 2017, holding that the order was passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, thereby violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, no deposit condition was imposed. However, as the petitioner voluntarily deposited 25% of the disputed tax, which the respondent did not oppose, the matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh adjudication after providing an opportunity of hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC set aside the impugned order determining the petitioner's liability to pay tax and interest under the TN GST Act 2017/CGST Act 2017, holding that the order was passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, thereby violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, no deposit condition was imposed. However, as the petitioner voluntarily deposited 25% of the disputed tax, which the respondent did not oppose, the matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh adjudication after providing an opportunity of hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.