Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned order determining the petitioner's liability to pay tax and interest under the TN GST Act 2017/CGST Act 2017, holding that the order was passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, thereby violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, no deposit condition was imposed. However, as the petitioner voluntarily deposited 25% of the disputed tax, which the respondent did not oppose, the matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh adjudication after providing an opportunity of hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC set aside the impugned order determining the petitioner's liability to pay tax and interest under the TN GST Act 2017/CGST Act 2017, holding that the order was passed without affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, thereby violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, no deposit condition was imposed. However, as the petitioner voluntarily deposited 25% of the disputed tax, which the respondent did not oppose, the matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh adjudication after providing an opportunity of hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
