Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the AO's disallowance under section 14A was unsustainable as no dissatisfaction with the assessee's suo motu disallowance was recorded before invoking Rule 8D, allowing the assessee's appeal. Regarding additions under section 43CA, the tribunal found the difference between the sale price and stamp duty value within the 10% tolerance limit, negating any addition. On foreign currency translation differences, the matter was remitted to the AO for verification due to inadequate examination during assessment and appeal stages. Lastly, the tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s confirmation of the AO's disallowance of carry-forward long-term capital loss where STT was paid, citing the risk of unverified set-offs against unrelated gains in future years.
The ITAT held that the AO's disallowance under section 14A was unsustainable as no dissatisfaction with the assessee's suo motu disallowance was recorded before invoking Rule 8D, allowing the assessee's appeal. Regarding additions under section 43CA, the tribunal found the difference between the sale price and stamp duty value within the 10% tolerance limit, negating any addition. On foreign currency translation differences, the matter was remitted to the AO for verification due to inadequate examination during assessment and appeal stages. Lastly, the tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s confirmation of the AO's disallowance of carry-forward long-term capital loss where STT was paid, citing the risk of unverified set-offs against unrelated gains in future years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
