Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC set aside the impugned order of the JM No.1, Ramanathapuram, which had dismissed the petition for return of seized shark fin properties. The petitioner failed to prove exclusive intra-state trade, but the Court found no evidence that the seized goods, partially comprising non-prohibited species, were intended for export without requisite permissions or destined for any foreign country, including Sri Lanka. The prosecution's objections to release lacked substantive basis, and the Magistrate's dismissal was deemed mechanical and unsustainable. Consequently, the Court allowed the criminal revision, ordering the return of the seized properties to the petitioner subject to compliance with imposed conditions.
The HC set aside the impugned order of the JM No.1, Ramanathapuram, which had dismissed the petition for return of seized shark fin properties. The petitioner failed to prove exclusive intra-state trade, but the Court found no evidence that the seized goods, partially comprising non-prohibited species, were intended for export without requisite permissions or destined for any foreign country, including Sri Lanka. The prosecution's objections to release lacked substantive basis, and the Magistrate's dismissal was deemed mechanical and unsustainable. Consequently, the Court allowed the criminal revision, ordering the return of the seized properties to the petitioner subject to compliance with imposed conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.