Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT allowed the appeal, holding that the impugned ex parte order against the appellant for alleged unfair trade practices in illiquid stock options at BSE was passed without serving a Show Cause Notice (SCN). The tribunal found that the appellant was deprived of a fair opportunity to present their case, rendering the order violative of natural justice principles under Article 14 of the Constitution. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the respondent for fresh adjudication after proper service of the SCN to the appellant.
The AT allowed the appeal, holding that the impugned ex parte order against the appellant for alleged unfair trade practices in illiquid stock options at BSE was passed without serving a Show Cause Notice (SCN). The tribunal found that the appellant was deprived of a fair opportunity to present their case, rendering the order violative of natural justice principles under Article 14 of the Constitution. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the respondent for fresh adjudication after proper service of the SCN to the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.