Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Board found that the Noticee, a stock broker, committed several minor and technical violations including non-reconciliation of client securities, deficiencies in client registration and account closure processes, minor discrepancies in net worth reporting, non-compliance with cybersecurity certification requirements, and lapses in cooperation with the inspection team. However, there was no evidence or finding of misutilization of client funds or serious investor harm. The Noticee took prompt corrective measures upon detection of violations. The Board held that these infractions were not material or grave enough to warrant regulatory censure or adverse action. Exercising powers under the SEBI Act and Intermediaries Regulations, the Board disposed of the proceedings against the Noticee without imposing penalties or other enforcement measures, emphasizing proportionality and the sufficiency of adjudication proceedings as enforcement in this matter.
The Board found that the Noticee, a stock broker, committed several minor and technical violations including non-reconciliation of client securities, deficiencies in client registration and account closure processes, minor discrepancies in net worth reporting, non-compliance with cybersecurity certification requirements, and lapses in cooperation with the inspection team. However, there was no evidence or finding of misutilization of client funds or serious investor harm. The Noticee took prompt corrective measures upon detection of violations. The Board held that these infractions were not material or grave enough to warrant regulatory censure or adverse action. Exercising powers under the SEBI Act and Intermediaries Regulations, the Board disposed of the proceedings against the Noticee without imposing penalties or other enforcement measures, emphasizing proportionality and the sufficiency of adjudication proceedings as enforcement in this matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.