Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The HC dismissed the bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC in a money laundering case under the PMLA. The Court held that the mandatory conditions under Section 45 of the PMLA for grant of bail were not satisfied, emphasizing the overriding effect of the PMLA over CrPC provisions. Despite the petitioner not being named in the predicate offence charge sheets, the Court found sufficient material indicating involvement in generating proceeds of crime through forgery and collusion. The Court underscored the gravity of economic offences involving corruption and held that delay in trial is not a ground for bail. No change in circumstances warranted reconsideration of the earlier rejected bail plea. Consequently, the Court concluded that the petitioner failed to establish exceptional grounds for bail, and the application was therefore rejected.
The HC dismissed the bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC in a money laundering case under the PMLA. The Court held that the mandatory conditions under Section 45 of the PMLA for grant of bail were not satisfied, emphasizing the overriding effect of the PMLA over CrPC provisions. Despite the petitioner not being named in the predicate offence charge sheets, the Court found sufficient material indicating involvement in generating proceeds of crime through forgery and collusion. The Court underscored the gravity of economic offences involving corruption and held that delay in trial is not a ground for bail. No change in circumstances warranted reconsideration of the earlier rejected bail plea. Consequently, the Court concluded that the petitioner failed to establish exceptional grounds for bail, and the application was therefore rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
