Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The HC dismissed the petitions on maintainability grounds, emphasizing the availability of an alternate and efficacious remedy by way of appeal. The court held that no patent breach of natural justice occurred, as the petitioners were served with show-cause notices and participated in the proceedings without raising the denial of hearing issue earlier. The refusal of adjournment did not amount to prejudice or a violation warranting departure from the rule of exhausting alternate remedies. The petitioners were granted liberty to file appeals against the impugned orders within six weeks, with a directive that the appellate authority consider the appeals on merits without raising limitation objections, given the bona fide prosecution of the petitions within limitation. The petitions were accordingly disposed of.
The HC dismissed the petitions on maintainability grounds, emphasizing the availability of an alternate and efficacious remedy by way of appeal. The court held that no patent breach of natural justice occurred, as the petitioners were served with show-cause notices and participated in the proceedings without raising the denial of hearing issue earlier. The refusal of adjournment did not amount to prejudice or a violation warranting departure from the rule of exhausting alternate remedies. The petitioners were granted liberty to file appeals against the impugned orders within six weeks, with a directive that the appellate authority consider the appeals on merits without raising limitation objections, given the bona fide prosecution of the petitions within limitation. The petitions were accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
