Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 26-04-2024 and the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice dated 27-12-2023, in light of the amended Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017, particularly sub-Section 5, which allows the registered person to claim Input Tax Credit for specified financial years up to 30 November 2021. The Court held that the challenge to the rejection of the claim filed after the original due date was rendered infructuous by the legislative amendment. The matter was remanded to the Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Dibrugarh Division, for issuance of a fresh Show Cause Notice and to proceed further after affording the petitioner a proper opportunity of hearing. The petition was disposed of by remand.
The HC set aside the impugned order dated 26-04-2024 and the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice dated 27-12-2023, in light of the amended Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017, particularly sub-Section 5, which allows the registered person to claim Input Tax Credit for specified financial years up to 30 November 2021. The Court held that the challenge to the rejection of the claim filed after the original due date was rendered infructuous by the legislative amendment. The matter was remanded to the Assistant Commissioner, CGST, Dibrugarh Division, for issuance of a fresh Show Cause Notice and to proceed further after affording the petitioner a proper opportunity of hearing. The petition was disposed of by remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
