Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
The HC granted bail to the accused in a case involving fraudulent availment of ITC relating to transactions from 2018-2019. The court emphasized factors such as the nature of the accusation, evidence, and risk of evidence tampering or witness intimidation. The accused has cooperated with the investigation, and documentary and electronic evidence have been secured. The accused has also paid the assessed tax liability of Rs. 1,66,89,405/-. There are no criminal antecedents, and the offense is triable by the HC. The court found no necessity for the accused's physical presence for further investigation and noted that the accused can cooperate by attending the respondent's office as required. Considering the investigation stage, the court held that continued detention served no purpose and allowed bail on execution of a PR bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- with sureties.
The HC granted bail to the accused in a case involving fraudulent availment of ITC relating to transactions from 2018-2019. The court emphasized factors such as the nature of the accusation, evidence, and risk of evidence tampering or witness intimidation. The accused has cooperated with the investigation, and documentary and electronic evidence have been secured. The accused has also paid the assessed tax liability of Rs. 1,66,89,405/-. There are no criminal antecedents, and the offense is triable by the HC. The court found no necessity for the accused's physical presence for further investigation and noted that the accused can cooperate by attending the respondent's office as required. Considering the investigation stage, the court held that continued detention served no purpose and allowed bail on execution of a PR bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- with sureties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
