Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that post the CBDT notification dated 29.03.2022, notices under section 148 must be issued exclusively by faceless assessing officers. Any notice issued by a jurisdictional assessing officer after this date is invalid. In the present case, the section 148 notice dated 30.03.2022 was issued by the jurisdictional officer, rendering it void ab initio. Consequently, the assessment order under section 147 dated 16.03.2023, based on the invalid notice, was also set aside. The tribunal quashed the notice and allowed the assessee's appeal, affirming that the procedural mandate for faceless issuance is mandatory and non-compliance vitiates the assessment proceedings.
The ITAT held that post the CBDT notification dated 29.03.2022, notices under section 148 must be issued exclusively by faceless assessing officers. Any notice issued by a jurisdictional assessing officer after this date is invalid. In the present case, the section 148 notice dated 30.03.2022 was issued by the jurisdictional officer, rendering it void ab initio. Consequently, the assessment order under section 147 dated 16.03.2023, based on the invalid notice, was also set aside. The tribunal quashed the notice and allowed the assessee's appeal, affirming that the procedural mandate for faceless issuance is mandatory and non-compliance vitiates the assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.