Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions relating to alleged bogus packaging and subcontracting expenses, finding the issue to be factual and dependent on evidence furnished by the assessee. The AO's disallowance lacked valid reasons and contrary evidence to disprove the genuineness of subcontractors. The tribunal rejected reliance on missing labor registers and other documentation as insufficient to negate the assessee's claim. Similarly, additions under section 69C for alleged out-of-book purchases based on input-output ratio comparisons were quashed, as the AO's conclusions were speculative and unsupported by credible evidence. The comparison with another entity was deemed irrelevant due to differing product lines. The ITAT found the CIT(A)'s findings to be based on cogent evidence and proper appreciation of facts and accordingly dismissed the revenue's appeal.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions relating to alleged bogus packaging and subcontracting expenses, finding the issue to be factual and dependent on evidence furnished by the assessee. The AO's disallowance lacked valid reasons and contrary evidence to disprove the genuineness of subcontractors. The tribunal rejected reliance on missing labor registers and other documentation as insufficient to negate the assessee's claim. Similarly, additions under section 69C for alleged out-of-book purchases based on input-output ratio comparisons were quashed, as the AO's conclusions were speculative and unsupported by credible evidence. The comparison with another entity was deemed irrelevant due to differing product lines. The ITAT found the CIT(A)'s findings to be based on cogent evidence and proper appreciation of facts and accordingly dismissed the revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
