Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the addition under Section 36(1)(va) regarding the employees' contribution to the Labour Welfare Fund was unsustainable. The assessee deposited the amount on 30.01.2021, which fell within the grace period allowed under the Punjab Labour Welfare Act, 1965. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the addition, affirming that the payment was made within the statutory timeline and therefore not liable for disallowance under the Income Tax Act.
The ITAT held that the addition under Section 36(1)(va) regarding the employees' contribution to the Labour Welfare Fund was unsustainable. The assessee deposited the amount on 30.01.2021, which fell within the grace period allowed under the Punjab Labour Welfare Act, 1965. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the addition, affirming that the payment was made within the statutory timeline and therefore not liable for disallowance under the Income Tax Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.