Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The HC directed that the confiscation of the imported goods alleged to be E-Rikshaws or their components be stayed, recognizing the policy favoring environmentally friendly vehicles. The Court reduced the pre-deposit to Rs 5.5 lakhs, to be paid within one month, before the CESTAT. The appeals challenging the Order-in-Original and the Director's appeal shall be heard on merits, including issues regarding the applicability of the impugned Office Order and whether the imported components constitute E-Rikshaws. The CESTAT was instructed to adjudicate and pass orders by 15th November 2025. The goods remain with Customs pending the CESTAT's decision. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC directed that the confiscation of the imported goods alleged to be E-Rikshaws or their components be stayed, recognizing the policy favoring environmentally friendly vehicles. The Court reduced the pre-deposit to Rs 5.5 lakhs, to be paid within one month, before the CESTAT. The appeals challenging the Order-in-Original and the Director's appeal shall be heard on merits, including issues regarding the applicability of the impugned Office Order and whether the imported components constitute E-Rikshaws. The CESTAT was instructed to adjudicate and pass orders by 15th November 2025. The goods remain with Customs pending the CESTAT's decision. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
