Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the assessee was not liable for disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS under section 195 before remittance abroad. The Tribunal relied on the Bombay HC decision in a similar matter favoring the assessee, clarifying that the Revenue's case did not fall within the exception under para 3.1(l) of the Circular dated 15.03.2024. The clause excludes appeals concerning recovery proceedings against deductors for failure to deduct tax at source. Consequently, the disallowance was set aside, confirming that the liability to deduct TDS prior to payment did not arise in the facts of the case, thereby allowing the claim of the assessee.
The ITAT held that the assessee was not liable for disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS under section 195 before remittance abroad. The Tribunal relied on the Bombay HC decision in a similar matter favoring the assessee, clarifying that the Revenue's case did not fall within the exception under para 3.1(l) of the Circular dated 15.03.2024. The clause excludes appeals concerning recovery proceedings against deductors for failure to deduct tax at source. Consequently, the disallowance was set aside, confirming that the liability to deduct TDS prior to payment did not arise in the facts of the case, thereby allowing the claim of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.