Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the assessee was not liable for disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS under section 195 before remittance abroad. The Tribunal relied on the Bombay HC decision in a similar matter favoring the assessee, clarifying that the Revenue's case did not fall within the exception under para 3.1(l) of the Circular dated 15.03.2024. The clause excludes appeals concerning recovery proceedings against deductors for failure to deduct tax at source. Consequently, the disallowance was set aside, confirming that the liability to deduct TDS prior to payment did not arise in the facts of the case, thereby allowing the claim of the assessee.
The ITAT held that the assessee was not liable for disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS under section 195 before remittance abroad. The Tribunal relied on the Bombay HC decision in a similar matter favoring the assessee, clarifying that the Revenue's case did not fall within the exception under para 3.1(l) of the Circular dated 15.03.2024. The clause excludes appeals concerning recovery proceedings against deductors for failure to deduct tax at source. Consequently, the disallowance was set aside, confirming that the liability to deduct TDS prior to payment did not arise in the facts of the case, thereby allowing the claim of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.