Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the AO exceeded jurisdiction by expanding limited scrutiny-restricted to share capital increase-to disallow depreciation on purchased goodwill, without requisite approval to convert it into full scrutiny. The assessment order was quashed as unlawful, following binding Board instructions. The Tribunal found that depreciation on purchased goodwill is allowable since it is a recognized intangible asset acquired through purchase, not arising from amalgamation or merger. The lower authorities erred in applying provisions meant for amalgamation cases. The assessee's valuation of goodwill, supported by an approved valuer's report and uncontested by the AO, was accepted. The AO's failure to obtain Joint Commissioner approval before nullifying goodwill cost further invalidated the addition. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, sustaining the claim for depreciation on purchased goodwill.
The ITAT held that the AO exceeded jurisdiction by expanding limited scrutiny-restricted to share capital increase-to disallow depreciation on purchased goodwill, without requisite approval to convert it into full scrutiny. The assessment order was quashed as unlawful, following binding Board instructions. The Tribunal found that depreciation on purchased goodwill is allowable since it is a recognized intangible asset acquired through purchase, not arising from amalgamation or merger. The lower authorities erred in applying provisions meant for amalgamation cases. The assessee's valuation of goodwill, supported by an approved valuer's report and uncontested by the AO, was accepted. The AO's failure to obtain Joint Commissioner approval before nullifying goodwill cost further invalidated the addition. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, sustaining the claim for depreciation on purchased goodwill.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.