Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the second bail application filed under sections 132(1)(c) and 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act, noting that the first bail application was not pressed after the applicant failed to comply with a prior court order to appear before the concerned court within two weeks. The court observed that the applicant remains out of custody and has flouted the consent order dated 2.1.2023. Given the applicant's non-compliance and absence from custody, the HC found no grounds to entertain the bail application on merit and consequently dismissed the second bail plea as devoid of merit.
The HC dismissed the second bail application filed under sections 132(1)(c) and 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act, noting that the first bail application was not pressed after the applicant failed to comply with a prior court order to appear before the concerned court within two weeks. The court observed that the applicant remains out of custody and has flouted the consent order dated 2.1.2023. Given the applicant's non-compliance and absence from custody, the HC found no grounds to entertain the bail application on merit and consequently dismissed the second bail plea as devoid of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
