Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the assessment order passed under section 143(3) in the name of the transferee bank was invalid as no notice under section 143(2) was issued to it post-amalgamation. Section 292BB does not validate the order since no notice emanated from the department to the transferee bank, consistent with Supreme Court precedent. The merger scheme allowed continuation of pending proceedings of the transferor banks but was silent on proceedings initiated after the scheme's effective date. Since the assessment for AY 2019-20 was initiated after the scheme came into force, provisions relating to continuation of pending proceedings were inapplicable. Consequently, the assessment order framed against the transferee bank without proper jurisdiction was quashed, and the assessee's cross-objections were allowed.
The ITAT held that the assessment order passed under section 143(3) in the name of the transferee bank was invalid as no notice under section 143(2) was issued to it post-amalgamation. Section 292BB does not validate the order since no notice emanated from the department to the transferee bank, consistent with Supreme Court precedent. The merger scheme allowed continuation of pending proceedings of the transferor banks but was silent on proceedings initiated after the scheme's effective date. Since the assessment for AY 2019-20 was initiated after the scheme came into force, provisions relating to continuation of pending proceedings were inapplicable. Consequently, the assessment order framed against the transferee bank without proper jurisdiction was quashed, and the assessee's cross-objections were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.