Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal regarding the non-inclusion of transit insurance charges in the assessable value for excise duty. It was determined that the sale occurred at the factory gate, with title and risk passing to the dealers at that point, who bore transportation costs thereafter. The excess transit insurance charges collected were found to be independent of the sale transaction and manufacturing activity, lacking nexus with the excisable goods. Consequently, these charges constituted mere profit, not subject to excise duty under Section 4(1)(a) of the Excise Act. The tribunal affirmed that the transaction value for excise duty assessment is limited to the ex-factory price, excluding the excess transit insurance amount.
The CESTAT upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal regarding the non-inclusion of transit insurance charges in the assessable value for excise duty. It was determined that the sale occurred at the factory gate, with title and risk passing to the dealers at that point, who bore transportation costs thereafter. The excess transit insurance charges collected were found to be independent of the sale transaction and manufacturing activity, lacking nexus with the excisable goods. Consequently, these charges constituted mere profit, not subject to excise duty under Section 4(1)(a) of the Excise Act. The tribunal affirmed that the transaction value for excise duty assessment is limited to the ex-factory price, excluding the excess transit insurance amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.