Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Res judicata in anti-profiteering proceedings barred reopening the same project, period and respondent after prior final adjudication.
    Rectification cannot recharacterise accepted survey disclosure as unexplained income when the issue is debatable.
    Section 87A rebate extends to long-term capital gains under section 112 absent an express statutory bar, the Tribunal holds.
    Search assessment and multiplex lease receipts: incriminating material limits additions, but commercial exploitation supported business income treatme...
    Reassessment by change of opinion fails where reopening rests on the same records and an incorrect factual premise.
    Limited scrutiny assessment cannot support additions beyond selected issues without conversion to complete scrutiny.
    Turnover filter and functional comparability in software transfer pricing upheld; limited comparables can still support arm's length benchmarking.
    Unsubstantiated commission-agent claim rejected; profit estimation from bank credits cut from 12.5% to 4% in trade income case.
    Diversion of income by overriding title shields liquidation receipts from tax where statutory application diverts realizations at source.
    Make available condition under the India-Netherlands treaty defeated FTS taxability; surcharge and cess beyond treaty rate were disallowed.
    Pre-deposit under customs appeals: filing and registration are allowed first, while entertainment can be withheld until deposit is considered.
    Anti-dumping duty time limit under Rule 18 expired, so final findings could no longer be acted upon.
    Transaction value for used machinery cannot be rejected on an unsupported local valuation when contemporaneous import evidence is unrebutted.
    Customs Broker penalty for alleged overvaluation abetment set aside absent proof of knowledge or involvement.
    Customs penalty fails without admissible proof of conscious involvement, as untested statements and bare allegations cannot sustain abetment findings.
    Town seizure of gold and silver fails without reasonable belief, foreign origin proof, or rebuttal of domestic purchase records
    Bona fide transferee protection for re-registered duty-free licences: customs demand and extended limitation were set aside.
    Locus to challenge Section 7 admission upheld where alleged loan was found to be a sham financial transaction.
    Moratorium adjustment and fraudulent trading claims remanded after material lease documents were not properly considered.
    Resolution plan approval under CIRP cannot be rejected on vague fairness concerns where statutory compliance and disclosure are established.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The HC found that service of show cause notices solely by...

Service of show cause notices only via GST portal violates Section 169, denying fair hearing and voiding ex parte orders

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

GST August 8, 2025 Case Laws HC
The HC found that service of show cause notices solely by uploading on the GST portal, without exploring alternate modes of service under Section 169 of the GST Act, violated principles of natural justice by denying the petitioner an effective opportunity of hearing. The impugned ex parte order dated 17.12.2024 was set aside due to inadequate service and lack of personal hearing. The matter was remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration, subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks of receiving the order. The setting aside of the order will take effect only upon such payment. The Court emphasized that reliance on a single mode of notice without due diligence to ensure effective service undermines the objectives of the GST Act and leads to unnecessary litigation, thereby wasting judicial and administrative resources. The petition was disposed accordingly.

Topics

Acts Income Tax