Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT set aside the penalty imposed under section 43 read with section 46 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income & Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, on the appellant for non-disclosure of foreign income in the FA schedule for AY 2015-16. The appellant had disclosed the foreign pension income and the corresponding tax paid in the computation of total income. The department did not dispute the pension nature of the amount or the tax payment. Given the disclosure and absence of departmental opposition, the Tribunal held that the penalty under section 43 was not warranted. The orders of the CIT(A) and the Assessing Officer imposing the penalty were accordingly set aside.
The ITAT set aside the penalty imposed under section 43 read with section 46 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income & Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, on the appellant for non-disclosure of foreign income in the FA schedule for AY 2015-16. The appellant had disclosed the foreign pension income and the corresponding tax paid in the computation of total income. The department did not dispute the pension nature of the amount or the tax payment. Given the disclosure and absence of departmental opposition, the Tribunal held that the penalty under section 43 was not warranted. The orders of the CIT(A) and the Assessing Officer imposing the penalty were accordingly set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
