Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the transaction involving revaluation of software in the partnership accounts did not constitute a transfer under section 47(xiii) and thus did not attract capital gains tax, as no real income accrued and no sale or transfer occurred. Consequently, the addition made by the AO was deleted. Regarding depreciation disallowance, the tribunal directed the AO to verify and allow depreciation in accordance with section 32(1) proviso, as the assessee provided requisite details showing depreciation claimed only up to the date of transfer. The reopening of assessment under section 43B was quashed due to lack of valid reasons, contradictions in the reasons recorded, and absence of any escapement of income. The CIT(A)'s confirmation of reopening without reasons was declared invalid, and the reassessment additions unrelated to the stated reasons were set aside. All contested grounds were allowed in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT held that the transaction involving revaluation of software in the partnership accounts did not constitute a transfer under section 47(xiii) and thus did not attract capital gains tax, as no real income accrued and no sale or transfer occurred. Consequently, the addition made by the AO was deleted. Regarding depreciation disallowance, the tribunal directed the AO to verify and allow depreciation in accordance with section 32(1) proviso, as the assessee provided requisite details showing depreciation claimed only up to the date of transfer. The reopening of assessment under section 43B was quashed due to lack of valid reasons, contradictions in the reasons recorded, and absence of any escapement of income. The CIT(A)'s confirmation of reopening without reasons was declared invalid, and the reassessment additions unrelated to the stated reasons were set aside. All contested grounds were allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.