Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The ITAT held that the transaction involving revaluation of software in the partnership accounts did not constitute a transfer under section 47(xiii) and thus did not attract capital gains tax, as no real income accrued and no sale or transfer occurred. Consequently, the addition made by the AO was deleted. Regarding depreciation disallowance, the tribunal directed the AO to verify and allow depreciation in accordance with section 32(1) proviso, as the assessee provided requisite details showing depreciation claimed only up to the date of transfer. The reopening of assessment under section 43B was quashed due to lack of valid reasons, contradictions in the reasons recorded, and absence of any escapement of income. The CIT(A)'s confirmation of reopening without reasons was declared invalid, and the reassessment additions unrelated to the stated reasons were set aside. All contested grounds were allowed in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT held that the transaction involving revaluation of software in the partnership accounts did not constitute a transfer under section 47(xiii) and thus did not attract capital gains tax, as no real income accrued and no sale or transfer occurred. Consequently, the addition made by the AO was deleted. Regarding depreciation disallowance, the tribunal directed the AO to verify and allow depreciation in accordance with section 32(1) proviso, as the assessee provided requisite details showing depreciation claimed only up to the date of transfer. The reopening of assessment under section 43B was quashed due to lack of valid reasons, contradictions in the reasons recorded, and absence of any escapement of income. The CIT(A)'s confirmation of reopening without reasons was declared invalid, and the reassessment additions unrelated to the stated reasons were set aside. All contested grounds were allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.