Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the transaction involving revaluation of software in the partnership accounts did not constitute a transfer under section 47(xiii) and thus did not attract capital gains tax, as no real income accrued and no sale or transfer occurred. Consequently, the addition made by the AO was deleted. Regarding depreciation disallowance, the tribunal directed the AO to verify and allow depreciation in accordance with section 32(1) proviso, as the assessee provided requisite details showing depreciation claimed only up to the date of transfer. The reopening of assessment under section 43B was quashed due to lack of valid reasons, contradictions in the reasons recorded, and absence of any escapement of income. The CIT(A)'s confirmation of reopening without reasons was declared invalid, and the reassessment additions unrelated to the stated reasons were set aside. All contested grounds were allowed in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT held that the transaction involving revaluation of software in the partnership accounts did not constitute a transfer under section 47(xiii) and thus did not attract capital gains tax, as no real income accrued and no sale or transfer occurred. Consequently, the addition made by the AO was deleted. Regarding depreciation disallowance, the tribunal directed the AO to verify and allow depreciation in accordance with section 32(1) proviso, as the assessee provided requisite details showing depreciation claimed only up to the date of transfer. The reopening of assessment under section 43B was quashed due to lack of valid reasons, contradictions in the reasons recorded, and absence of any escapement of income. The CIT(A)'s confirmation of reopening without reasons was declared invalid, and the reassessment additions unrelated to the stated reasons were set aside. All contested grounds were allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.