Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the impugned show cause notice dated 17.05.2022, challenging the classification of the petitioner's product under Chapter 21 instead of Chapter 08 of the Customs Tariff Act, was issued without proper application of mind and contrary to settled legal precedents, including rulings of the Apex Court and AAAR. Given that there was no change in the tariff item, character of the goods, or relevant law post-GST implementation, the classification under Chapter 0802 remained valid. The Court found the re-initiation of proceedings on a settled issue to be an abuse of process of law and accordingly quashed the show cause notice. The petition was allowed, thereby putting an end to the challenge against the product's classification.
The HC held that the impugned show cause notice dated 17.05.2022, challenging the classification of the petitioner's product under Chapter 21 instead of Chapter 08 of the Customs Tariff Act, was issued without proper application of mind and contrary to settled legal precedents, including rulings of the Apex Court and AAAR. Given that there was no change in the tariff item, character of the goods, or relevant law post-GST implementation, the classification under Chapter 0802 remained valid. The Court found the re-initiation of proceedings on a settled issue to be an abuse of process of law and accordingly quashed the show cause notice. The petition was allowed, thereby putting an end to the challenge against the product's classification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.