Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT upheld that the appellant, a secured creditor, failed to comply with the mandatory 90-day timeline under Regulation 21A(2)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, for depositing dues under Section 53 of the IBC. The Tribunal confirmed that liquidator's dues under Section 36(4) are protected and payable in full by the secured creditor, independent of the realization of security interest. The secured creditor's obligation to pay dues under Section 53 is not contingent upon realization of security interest under Section 52, and the liquidator's permission to realize security interest is a prerequisite. The appellant's request to defer payment until after realization was legally untenable. No application for time extension was made, and failure to deposit dues resulted in automatic vesting of assets in the liquidation estate. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.
The NCLAT upheld that the appellant, a secured creditor, failed to comply with the mandatory 90-day timeline under Regulation 21A(2)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016, for depositing dues under Section 53 of the IBC. The Tribunal confirmed that liquidator's dues under Section 36(4) are protected and payable in full by the secured creditor, independent of the realization of security interest. The secured creditor's obligation to pay dues under Section 53 is not contingent upon realization of security interest under Section 52, and the liquidator's permission to realize security interest is a prerequisite. The appellant's request to defer payment until after realization was legally untenable. No application for time extension was made, and failure to deposit dues resulted in automatic vesting of assets in the liquidation estate. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
