Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC upheld the AO's findings, rejecting the Revenue's appeal as the issues raised did not stem from the original assessment order. The court affirmed that payments made by the assessee to an overseas associate enterprise for conducting general training workshops did not constitute fees for technical services under Article 12 of the India-Singapore DTAA. The court emphasized that definitions under the DTAA govern such terms, not domestic tax law, and general employee training lacks the transfer of technical knowledge or skill necessary to qualify as technical services. Consequently, the addition for payments to seconded employees was not warranted, and the treatment of free-of-cost assets and related depreciation in computing operating profit margin under transfer pricing provisions was upheld. No substantial question of law arose, and the impugned order stood confirmed.
The HC upheld the AO's findings, rejecting the Revenue's appeal as the issues raised did not stem from the original assessment order. The court affirmed that payments made by the assessee to an overseas associate enterprise for conducting general training workshops did not constitute fees for technical services under Article 12 of the India-Singapore DTAA. The court emphasized that definitions under the DTAA govern such terms, not domestic tax law, and general employee training lacks the transfer of technical knowledge or skill necessary to qualify as technical services. Consequently, the addition for payments to seconded employees was not warranted, and the treatment of free-of-cost assets and related depreciation in computing operating profit margin under transfer pricing provisions was upheld. No substantial question of law arose, and the impugned order stood confirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.