Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 based on third-party information recovered from a search at Radha Mohan Totla's associate was invalid as the transactions recorded in the excel sheet found on the pen drive were admitted by Mr. Ajit Singh in his individual capacity, who also paid tax thereon. The assessee's liability could not be fastened as the digital evidence was not in his name, and no direct link or ownership of transactions was established against him. The same transactions were also the subject matter of reassessment proceedings against M/s Unique Dream Builders Pvt Ltd, raising the principle against double taxation of identical income. The AO failed to examine the third party or provide the assessee an opportunity for cross-examination, violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the additions confirmed by the CIT(A) were set aside, and the impugned additions were deleted. Grounds challenging the additions were allowed.
The ITAT held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 based on third-party information recovered from a search at Radha Mohan Totla's associate was invalid as the transactions recorded in the excel sheet found on the pen drive were admitted by Mr. Ajit Singh in his individual capacity, who also paid tax thereon. The assessee's liability could not be fastened as the digital evidence was not in his name, and no direct link or ownership of transactions was established against him. The same transactions were also the subject matter of reassessment proceedings against M/s Unique Dream Builders Pvt Ltd, raising the principle against double taxation of identical income. The AO failed to examine the third party or provide the assessee an opportunity for cross-examination, violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the additions confirmed by the CIT(A) were set aside, and the impugned additions were deleted. Grounds challenging the additions were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.