Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that reopening assessment proceedings against a deceased assessee without issuing a valid notice under Section 148 to the legal heir is invalid. Although a notice under Section 159 was served on the legal heir, no corresponding Section 148 notice was issued to confer jurisdiction for reassessment. The absence of a Section 148 notice addressed to the legal heir rendered the reassessment proceedings and resultant additions void and vitiated. Consequently, the tribunal quashed the reassessment and allowed the appeal, reaffirming that service of a valid Section 148 notice to a living person, i.e., the legal heir, is a mandatory jurisdictional requirement before reopening assessment of a deceased assessee.
The ITAT held that reopening assessment proceedings against a deceased assessee without issuing a valid notice under Section 148 to the legal heir is invalid. Although a notice under Section 159 was served on the legal heir, no corresponding Section 148 notice was issued to confer jurisdiction for reassessment. The absence of a Section 148 notice addressed to the legal heir rendered the reassessment proceedings and resultant additions void and vitiated. Consequently, the tribunal quashed the reassessment and allowed the appeal, reaffirming that service of a valid Section 148 notice to a living person, i.e., the legal heir, is a mandatory jurisdictional requirement before reopening assessment of a deceased assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.