Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that reopening assessment proceedings against a deceased assessee without issuing a valid notice under Section 148 to the legal heir is invalid. Although a notice under Section 159 was served on the legal heir, no corresponding Section 148 notice was issued to confer jurisdiction for reassessment. The absence of a Section 148 notice addressed to the legal heir rendered the reassessment proceedings and resultant additions void and vitiated. Consequently, the tribunal quashed the reassessment and allowed the appeal, reaffirming that service of a valid Section 148 notice to a living person, i.e., the legal heir, is a mandatory jurisdictional requirement before reopening assessment of a deceased assessee.
The ITAT held that reopening assessment proceedings against a deceased assessee without issuing a valid notice under Section 148 to the legal heir is invalid. Although a notice under Section 159 was served on the legal heir, no corresponding Section 148 notice was issued to confer jurisdiction for reassessment. The absence of a Section 148 notice addressed to the legal heir rendered the reassessment proceedings and resultant additions void and vitiated. Consequently, the tribunal quashed the reassessment and allowed the appeal, reaffirming that service of a valid Section 148 notice to a living person, i.e., the legal heir, is a mandatory jurisdictional requirement before reopening assessment of a deceased assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.