Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the reassessment order issued in the name of a deceased assessee is invalid where the AO, despite being informed of the assessee's death, failed to issue a fresh notice under section 148 to the legal heir. The Tribunal relied on the jurisdictional High Court ruling which clarified that informing the AO of the death and requesting to drop proceedings does not amount to participation under section 292B, thereby rendering the original notice defective and void. Consequently, reopening assessment proceedings against a deceased person without proper notice to the legal representative is legally impermissible. The appeal was allowed, quashing the reassessment order passed in the name of the deceased.
The ITAT held that the reassessment order issued in the name of a deceased assessee is invalid where the AO, despite being informed of the assessee's death, failed to issue a fresh notice under section 148 to the legal heir. The Tribunal relied on the jurisdictional High Court ruling which clarified that informing the AO of the death and requesting to drop proceedings does not amount to participation under section 292B, thereby rendering the original notice defective and void. Consequently, reopening assessment proceedings against a deceased person without proper notice to the legal representative is legally impermissible. The appeal was allowed, quashing the reassessment order passed in the name of the deceased.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
