Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
The ITAT held that the reassessment order issued in the name of a deceased assessee is invalid where the AO, despite being informed of the assessee's death, failed to issue a fresh notice under section 148 to the legal heir. The Tribunal relied on the jurisdictional High Court ruling which clarified that informing the AO of the death and requesting to drop proceedings does not amount to participation under section 292B, thereby rendering the original notice defective and void. Consequently, reopening assessment proceedings against a deceased person without proper notice to the legal representative is legally impermissible. The appeal was allowed, quashing the reassessment order passed in the name of the deceased.
The ITAT held that the reassessment order issued in the name of a deceased assessee is invalid where the AO, despite being informed of the assessee's death, failed to issue a fresh notice under section 148 to the legal heir. The Tribunal relied on the jurisdictional High Court ruling which clarified that informing the AO of the death and requesting to drop proceedings does not amount to participation under section 292B, thereby rendering the original notice defective and void. Consequently, reopening assessment proceedings against a deceased person without proper notice to the legal representative is legally impermissible. The appeal was allowed, quashing the reassessment order passed in the name of the deceased.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
