Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT set aside the impugned order passed under section 250 by the NFAC, observing that the NFAC failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of section 250(6) of the Act by not stating the points of determination, its decisions thereon, and clear reasons for confirming the additions. Although the NFAC acted within the restrictions of section 251(1)(a) by adjudicating ex parte due to the assessee's non-compliance and absence of cogent evidence, it erred in merely confirming the assessment order without independent inquiry or reasoned findings. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the NFAC for de novo adjudication, directing it to provide the assessee no more than three opportunities to present its case and to pass a reasoned, speaking order in accordance with section 250(6). The ITAT refrained from expressing any view on the merits.
The ITAT set aside the impugned order passed under section 250 by the NFAC, observing that the NFAC failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of section 250(6) of the Act by not stating the points of determination, its decisions thereon, and clear reasons for confirming the additions. Although the NFAC acted within the restrictions of section 251(1)(a) by adjudicating ex parte due to the assessee's non-compliance and absence of cogent evidence, it erred in merely confirming the assessment order without independent inquiry or reasoned findings. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the NFAC for de novo adjudication, directing it to provide the assessee no more than three opportunities to present its case and to pass a reasoned, speaking order in accordance with section 250(6). The ITAT refrained from expressing any view on the merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.