Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC upheld the Tribunal's dismissal of the revenue's appeal concerning the refund claim under the Customs Act, 1962. It was held that the protest marked by the assessee during duty payment signifies non-voluntary payment, preventing finalization of assessment under Section 17 until reassessment proceedings are initiated. The Tribunal's reliance on this principle was affirmed, reinforcing that the refund application must comply with the one-year limitation from the Supreme Court's judgment as per Section 27(1B)(b). Additionally, since the respondent claimed interest only after 90 days from refund grant, the revenue's objection on interest timing was rejected. The HC answered the substantial questions of law against the revenue, confirming the Tribunal's order and dismissing the appeal.
The HC upheld the Tribunal's dismissal of the revenue's appeal concerning the refund claim under the Customs Act, 1962. It was held that the protest marked by the assessee during duty payment signifies non-voluntary payment, preventing finalization of assessment under Section 17 until reassessment proceedings are initiated. The Tribunal's reliance on this principle was affirmed, reinforcing that the refund application must comply with the one-year limitation from the Supreme Court's judgment as per Section 27(1B)(b). Additionally, since the respondent claimed interest only after 90 days from refund grant, the revenue's objection on interest timing was rejected. The HC answered the substantial questions of law against the revenue, confirming the Tribunal's order and dismissing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
