Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the appeal filed by members of the NCLT Advocates Bar Association challenging the denial of basic facilities at the NCLT Kolkata Bench and its relocation. The Court held that matters concerning infrastructure allocation and the location of judicial forums fall within the exclusive administrative discretion of the executive, specifically the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, and are not subject to judicial interference absent demonstrable illegality, arbitrariness, or constitutional violation. Upholding the doctrine of separation of powers, the HC emphasized judicial restraint, recognizing that courts must not encroach upon executive functions. The Court found no grounds to override the executive's decision regarding the relocation and improved facilities, thus declining to issue any directive. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the administrative authority's prerogative in managing tribunal infrastructure and location.
The HC dismissed the appeal filed by members of the NCLT Advocates Bar Association challenging the denial of basic facilities at the NCLT Kolkata Bench and its relocation. The Court held that matters concerning infrastructure allocation and the location of judicial forums fall within the exclusive administrative discretion of the executive, specifically the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, and are not subject to judicial interference absent demonstrable illegality, arbitrariness, or constitutional violation. Upholding the doctrine of separation of powers, the HC emphasized judicial restraint, recognizing that courts must not encroach upon executive functions. The Court found no grounds to override the executive's decision regarding the relocation and improved facilities, thus declining to issue any directive. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the administrative authority's prerogative in managing tribunal infrastructure and location.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
