Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Board found that the Noticees engaged in spoofing, a manipulative trading practice violating sections 12A(a), (b), (c) of the SEBI Act and multiple provisions of the PFUTP Regulations, by placing and canceling non-genuine orders to mislead the market and execute trades on the opposite side. The principal violator, a registered stock broker, executed such manipulations across numerous scrips over three years, accruing unlawful gains of INR 3.22 crores. Executive directors were held vicariously liable under section 27 of the SEBI Act. Consequently, interim measures were imposed: impoundment of unlawful gains via fixed deposits with SEBI lien; prohibition on securities trading and market access for all Noticees; restrictions on bank and depository transactions; and asset freeze pending further investigation. Noticees must provide full asset inventories within 15 days. The order permits closing existing derivative positions within three months and directs SEBI to complete detailed investigation expeditiously.
The Board found that the Noticees engaged in spoofing, a manipulative trading practice violating sections 12A(a), (b), (c) of the SEBI Act and multiple provisions of the PFUTP Regulations, by placing and canceling non-genuine orders to mislead the market and execute trades on the opposite side. The principal violator, a registered stock broker, executed such manipulations across numerous scrips over three years, accruing unlawful gains of INR 3.22 crores. Executive directors were held vicariously liable under section 27 of the SEBI Act. Consequently, interim measures were imposed: impoundment of unlawful gains via fixed deposits with SEBI lien; prohibition on securities trading and market access for all Noticees; restrictions on bank and depository transactions; and asset freeze pending further investigation. Noticees must provide full asset inventories within 15 days. The order permits closing existing derivative positions within three months and directs SEBI to complete detailed investigation expeditiously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
