Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 13(1) of FEMA for contravention of Section 6(3)(i) and Regulation 3(a) of the Foreign Exchange Management (Acquisition and Transfer of Immovable Property in India) Regulations, 2000. The appellant, having purchased agricultural land in India during 2012-13 after returning to India, was held not to be a person resident in India under Section 2(v)(i) of FEMA, as he did not fulfill the requisite residential criteria in the preceding financial year. The Tribunal confirmed that mens rea is not a prerequisite for imposing penalty under FEMA, which deals with civil obligations. Considering the appellant's lawful foreign earnings and partial pre-deposit of penalty, the AT reduced the penalty from Rs. 8,00,000 to Rs. 2,00,000, directing adjustment against any pre-deposit already made.
The AT upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 13(1) of FEMA for contravention of Section 6(3)(i) and Regulation 3(a) of the Foreign Exchange Management (Acquisition and Transfer of Immovable Property in India) Regulations, 2000. The appellant, having purchased agricultural land in India during 2012-13 after returning to India, was held not to be a person resident in India under Section 2(v)(i) of FEMA, as he did not fulfill the requisite residential criteria in the preceding financial year. The Tribunal confirmed that mens rea is not a prerequisite for imposing penalty under FEMA, which deals with civil obligations. Considering the appellant's lawful foreign earnings and partial pre-deposit of penalty, the AT reduced the penalty from Rs. 8,00,000 to Rs. 2,00,000, directing adjustment against any pre-deposit already made.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
