Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that denial of the mandatory video conference personal hearing under the Faceless Assessment provisions u/s 144B constitutes a violation of natural justice. Despite the petitioner's failure to initially respond, the department was obligated to send physical communication to the last known address. In this case, the petitioner explicitly requested a video conference hearing, which was not granted, thereby breaching the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). Consequently, the impugned Assessment Order and demand notice dated 19.03.2025 are quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded to the National Faceless Assessment Authority for compliance with the SOP and issuance of a fresh order in accordance with proper procedural safeguards.
The HC held that denial of the mandatory video conference personal hearing under the Faceless Assessment provisions u/s 144B constitutes a violation of natural justice. Despite the petitioner's failure to initially respond, the department was obligated to send physical communication to the last known address. In this case, the petitioner explicitly requested a video conference hearing, which was not granted, thereby breaching the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). Consequently, the impugned Assessment Order and demand notice dated 19.03.2025 are quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded to the National Faceless Assessment Authority for compliance with the SOP and issuance of a fresh order in accordance with proper procedural safeguards.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.