Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT set aside the orders of the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC on three key issues and remanded them to the AO for fresh adjudication with due opportunity to the assessee. First, regarding disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for TDS not deposited within the prescribed time, the AO is directed to verify payment dates and allow deduction only when tax is paid within the stipulated period. Second, concerning addition under section 40A(3) for cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 without prescribed modes, the matter is restored for fresh examination after affording the assessee a hearing, given the absence of remand report and clarity. Third, on addition under section 68 for unexplained cash credits, the AO must reassess the identity, creditworthiness of creditors, and genuineness of transactions, as the CIT(A)/NFAC's order was cryptic and unsupported. All appeals are allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT set aside the orders of the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC on three key issues and remanded them to the AO for fresh adjudication with due opportunity to the assessee. First, regarding disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for TDS not deposited within the prescribed time, the AO is directed to verify payment dates and allow deduction only when tax is paid within the stipulated period. Second, concerning addition under section 40A(3) for cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 without prescribed modes, the matter is restored for fresh examination after affording the assessee a hearing, given the absence of remand report and clarity. Third, on addition under section 68 for unexplained cash credits, the AO must reassess the identity, creditworthiness of creditors, and genuineness of transactions, as the CIT(A)/NFAC's order was cryptic and unsupported. All appeals are allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.