Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income cannot be sustained where the assessee filed return in response to section 148 notice and computed long-term capital loss after considering section 50C and pre-indexed cost of improvements. Since the capital gains computation resulted in a loss and no tax liability arose, the foundational addition for imposing penalty ceased to exist. The Tribunal relied on established legal principles that penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot survive if the quantum addition is deleted or substantially modified to extinguish tax liability. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty was set aside.
The ITAT held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income cannot be sustained where the assessee filed return in response to section 148 notice and computed long-term capital loss after considering section 50C and pre-indexed cost of improvements. Since the capital gains computation resulted in a loss and no tax liability arose, the foundational addition for imposing penalty ceased to exist. The Tribunal relied on established legal principles that penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot survive if the quantum addition is deleted or substantially modified to extinguish tax liability. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.